Literature reviews  >  Articles for review > Cosentino et al. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis... 

 

About SDI
Mission
Diagnostic
Priorities
Workplan
Activities
Newsletters
Grants
Publications
Journal articles
Guidelines
Manuals
Reports
Literature reviews
Contact us

Vaginal swabs were acceptable specimens for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae by the BDProbeTec ET system, but use of an amplification control with this specimen had minimal impact on test performance.

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by strand displacement amplification and relevance of the amplification control for use with vaginal swab specimens.
Cosentino LA, Landers DV, Hillier SL.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003;41:3592-3596.

 

Summary:

Question
How well do vaginal swabs perform compared to cervical swabs as specimens for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae by the BDProbeTec ET system, and how does use of an amplification control affect performance?

Design
The detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae by the BDProbeTec ET system using vaginal swabs was compared to detection by the BDProbeTec ET system, by PCR (for C. trachomatis), and by culture (for N. gonorrhoeae) using endocervical swabs. The use of an amplification control for identification of indeterminate results of vaginal swabs by the BDProbeTec ET system was evaluated.

Participants
Four hundred fifty-five symptomatic women, aged 18 to 40, attending primary health care and STD clinics in Pittsburgh, PA, were tested for the study comparing the results of vaginal and cervical swab specimens. For the study of only vaginal swab specimens tested by BDProbeTec ET using the amplification control, 2973 women, enrolled at five locations, were tested.

Description of Tests and Diagnostic Standard
Cervical and vaginal swabs were tested using a strand displacement amplification assay (SDA) on the BDProbeTec ET instrument (Becton Dicksinson, Sparks, MD) for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, including an amplification control to detect inhibitors of amplification, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Separate cervical swab specimens were tested for C. trachomatis by Amplicor PCR (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, NJ) according to the instructions in the manufacturer's package insert, and for N. gonorrhoeae by standard culture on Thayer-Martin and chocolate medium and identification by Gram staining, oxidase test, and the Gonocheck II system (EY Laboratories, Inc., San Mateo, CA). In cases of disagreement between the C. trachomatis results of SDA and PCR or the N. gonorrhoeae results of SDA and culture, a fourth cervical swab was tested by LCR (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) according to the manufacturer's instruction. The collection order for the swabs was rotated to reduce potential sampling bias. Samples were considered positive for C. trachomatis if positive by two nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), and for N. gonorrhoeae if positive by culture or by two NAAT.

Main Outcome Measures
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of C. trachomatis detection by PCR and SDA in cervical and vaginal swabs, and of N. gonorrhoeae detection by culture and SDA in cervical and vaginal swabs, as determined by the definition described above, were calculated. The prevalence of indeterminate results for the BDProbeTec ET assay when tested on vaginal swab specimens was determined.

Main Results
Of the 455 women tested by SDA, PCR, and N. gonorrhoeae culture, 37 (8.1%) and 39 (8.6%) were positive for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, respectively. The performances of PCR and SDA on vaginal and cervical swab specimens for the detection of C. trachomatis, and of culture and SDA on vaginal and cervical swabs for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae are shown in the table. According to the BDProbeTec ET amplification control, indeterminate results were obtained for 0.7% of cervical swab and 6.4% of vaginal swab specimens. All indeterminate results were resolved as negative by repeat testing.

Of 1326 vaginal swabs tested by BDProbeTec ET using the amplification control, 375 (28%) were indeterminate. When 134 of the indeterminate specimens were retested undiluted, only 43 (32%) were resolved. When 484 specimens were diluted 1:10 and retested, all the originally indeterminate results resolved as negative; however, seven samples that were originally positive for C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae became negative. Of 1647 additional vaginal swabs tested by BDProbeTec ET using the amplification control, 413 (25%) yielded indeterminate test results. Following 1:1 dilution and retesting, 6 (1.5%) of the initially indeterminate results resolved as positive for C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae.

Authors' Conclusions
SDA of vaginal swab specimens has a sensitivity and specificity equivalent to those of cervical swab specimens for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae and are an acceptable alternative to cervical swab specimens in the BDProbeTec ET system. Although one in four vaginal swab specimens yielded an indeterminate result when the amplification control was used, retesting of indeterminate samples by repeating SDA or by PCR usually yielded negative results.

Source of funding: In part by the U. S. Department of Defense and by Becton-Dickinson.

For correspondence: Sharon L. Hillier, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital, 300 Halket St., Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3180. E-mail address: slh6+@pitt.edu.

   

about SDI | newsletters | grants | publications | literature reviews

WHO Home - WHO Search - TDR Home - SDI Home - SDI Contact us
(c) WHO/OMS 2001